Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for July 14th, 2008

By- Suzie-Q @ 7:05 PM MST

Iglesias: Ashcroft pushed out for wiretap opposition

Raw Story- Stephen C. Webster

Published: Monday July 14, 2008

In an interview with the Dallas Morning News, former U.S. Attorney David Iglesias, who was at the epicenter of the recent U.S. attorneys scandal, claims that former Attorney General John Ashcroft was “pushed out” for his refusal to sign off on an administration wiretapping order.

The interview, penned by Morning News contributor Todd Robberson, Iglesias states:

The one really intriguing question I’ve had was from a book buyer a few months ago who asked whether I thought John Ashcroft had been pushed out or not after he refused to sign off on the warrantless wiretaps. That’s something that a journalist has never asked me. The honest answer is, yes, that had Ashcroft done the wrong thing, the unconstitutional thing, and signed off on it, he’d probably still be the AG. But Ashcroft served honorably. He did the right thing, and he paid the price. He was asked to move on.

In the aftermath of the U.S. attorneys scandal, and the proceeding investigations into the Bush Administration’s misuse of the Justice Department, the President’s closest political adviser, Karl Rove, was subpoenaed to testify before the judiciary committee. Rove is widely suspected to have played a role in the Justice Department’s prosecution and subsequent jailing of Alabama Governor Don Siegelman on charges of bribery, as detailed in a series of RAW STORY exclusive reports.

On July 10, the committee voted 7-1 to reject Rove’s claim that his refusal of the subpoena was grounded in ‘executive privilege’ and Chairman John Conyers (D-MI) issued Rove an ultimatum allowing five more days before pursuing ‘all available options.’ At the hearing, the Judiciary committee was then informed that Rove had left the country.

Iglesias added:

Had we been fired a year earlier, it’s possible this would never have come to light because there would not have been interest by the majority [Republicans] on Capitol Hill to investigate why is it that seven U.S. attorneys got pushed out on the same day in an unprecedented action. It would’ve never risen to that level. The media would’ve picked up on it a little bit maybe. But the Democrats ran with it when, last year, they were fresh in power. I’m sure they were looking for areas in which to exercise oversight, and this was handed to them on a golden platter by the Republicans. But I want to make clear, they [the administration] got away with it. … There was no hue and cry. There was no press coverage that I’m aware of [after the initial firings of two U.S. attorneys]. I think the hubris kicked in and they figured, heck, if we can get rid of two over a six-month period, why not get rid of seven more on the same day?

David Iglesias’ book, “In Justice,” covering the U.S. attorneys scandal, is in bookstores now.

Read Full Post »

Evening Jukebox… Bad Moon Rising

By- Suzie-Q @ 7:00 PM MST

CCR- Bad Moon Rising

Read Full Post »

Fresh Fears of Wamu and National City Going Under..

GEF @ 9:00 PM ET

WaMu and National City plummet

Shares of the two troubled banks each plunge about 30% as investors fear the possibility of more bank failures.

By David Goldman, CNNMoney.com staff writer

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — Shares of Washington Mutual and National City both plunged Monday as fears grew about the credit crisis plaguing big banks.

Both banks have been hit particularly hard by the subprime mortgage meltdown and ensuing credit crisis, as they had to raise significant capital to cover bad home loans from their residential mortgage lending businesses.

Washington Mutual shares plummeted 34.8% after a note from a Lehman Brothers analyst suggested that the bank may need to “substantially” raise its reserves over the course of 2008 to cover losses from home loans.

Lehman analyst Bruce Harting said he expects the bank will report $26 billion in cumulative losses – $21 billion of which are expected to come from home loans – when the company announces its results on July 22.

WaMu responded after the market close with a statement, saying it is sufficiently capitalized, with more than $40 billion in excess liquidity after it recently raised $7.2 billion in capital.

“The company significantly exceeds all regulatory ‘well-capitalized’ minimums for depository institutions,” the bank said in a statement.

Harting caused waves last week when his note about how a potential accounting change may require beleaguered mortgage financing giants Fannie Mae (FNM, Fortune 500) and Freddie Mac (FRE, Fortune 500) to raise a combined $75 billion sent those stocks on a week-long slide, culminating in Sunday’s proposed rescue plan by the Treasury Department and Federal Reserve.

Harting said he expects Seattle-based WaMu to take a $4 billion provision in the second quarter and that the company will report a loss of $1.48 per share in the quarter. That’s more than the 93-cent- per-share loss being predicted by the rest of Wall Street, according to Thomson Reuters.

The Lehman analyst said WaMu (WM, Fortune 500) should have sufficient capital to make it through this credit cycle without needing to raise more. But as the bank builds reserves to cover losses, “it should remain unprofitable until credit costs normalize.”

A Ladenburg Thalmann analyst went further. Richard Bove, in a report Monday, wrote that Washington Mutual is on the edge of the “danger zone.”

As for National City (NCC, Fortune 500), shares fell more than 14.7% Monday amid talk that the Cleveland-based bank was on the verge of collapse. National City will report its second-quarter results next week, and analysts are predicting a loss of 26 cents per share.

The bank, however, insisted that the speculation was unfounded.

“National City is experiencing no unusual depositor or creditor activity,” said the bank in a statement. “As of the close of Friday’s business, the bank maintained more than $12 billion of excess short-term liquidity.”

The bank also said it maintains one of the best capital ratios among large banks, after it recently raised $7 billion.

Investors worry about another bank failure

Concerns about bank failures have reached a fever pitch following the seizure of troubled mortgage lender IndyMac Bancorp Inc (IMB). Friday. The failure of IndyMac was the second-largest bank collapse in the nation’s history.

“Investors want to know who’s next to fail,” said Matt McCormick, a Bahl & Gaynor Investment Council bank analyst. “Both banks fit a similar profile to IndyMac in that they have been huge drivers in the mortgage market.”

But other analysts said neither bank was on the verge of collapse.

“What we’re seeing is mostly just investor panic,” said Gerard Cassidy, RBC Capital Markets analyst, who does not believe that either bank is on the verge of failure. “These companies have a considerable amount of capital.”

At the time of collapse, IndyMac’s debt was 140% of its tangible capital and reserves, but both WaMu and National City have a debt level of less than 50% of its assets, Cassidy said.

“It’s bad and it’s not over yet, but investors are throwing out the baby with the bath water,” he added. “The prospect of one of these banks failing is far-fetched. Both have ample liquidity.”

Financial sector takes a pounding

Other financial institutions also suffered steep losses Monday after a painful day on Friday.

First Horizon National (FHN) dropped 24.8%, Zions Bancorp (ZION) sank 23.2%, M&T Bank Corp. (MTB) fell 18% and Wachovia (WB, Fortune 500) fell another 14.7% Monday after tumbling 12% Friday.

Larger banks due to report results later this week fared only slightly better. Wells Fargo (WFC, Fortune 500) lost 6.2%, Citigroup (C, Fortune 500) fell 6% and JPMorgan (JPM, Fortune 500) sank 4.4%

Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500), which just completed its acquisition of Countrywide Financial – making it the nation’s largest mortgage lender – slid 7%.  To top of page

Read Full Post »

Panic “Bank Runs” Hits IndyMac

GEF @ 6:20 PM ET

IndyMac depositors line up for cash after seizure

By Gina Keating

PASADENA, California (Reuters) – Hundreds of worried IndyMac Bancorp Inc customers descended on the company’s branches on Monday to withdraw their money, after regulators seized what was once one of the largest mortgage lenders in the United States.

Regulators took over the Pasadena-based lender on Friday after a bank run in which customers — panicked over IndyMac’s survival prospects — withdrew $1.3 billion over 11 business days, regulators said.

At a branch at IndyMac’s headquarters, customers began arriving at 4 a.m., five hours before the doors opened. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp now operates the thrift’s 33 Southern California branches.

“I didn’t think anything like this would happen,” said retired teacher Charles Tengeri from Pasadena, who was first to emerge from the branch after withdrawing $171,000 — about two-thirds of his life savings. “I withdrew as much as I could. I know it’s going to take a little time.”

The FDIC said the renamed IndyMac Federal Bank will cover insured deposits, mostly up to $100,000, and initially cover 50 percent of uninsured deposits.

“I have $360,000 in this bank, and I was misled by this bank,” said Robert Clark, a Glendale resident. “I gave the names of my mother, my sister and my brother on the account so I thought I would be insured. I don’t know what to do. I really don’t know what to do.”

John Bovenzi, an FDIC official working as IndyMac Federal’s chief executive, talked with customers as they waited for the doors to open, assuring one that “this bank is as safe and as sound as any bank in the country right now.”

The FDIC is hoping to sell IndyMac within 90 days. Among IndyMac’s assets are a rapidly deteriorating mortgage loan book, the 33 branches, and the Financial Freedom unit that makes “reverse” mortgages for older Americans.

(more…)

Read Full Post »

The New Yorker’s Obama Cover Is Bad Satire

by Bob Cesca @ 6:16 PM (EST)

Among our ever growing roster of things to hate and fear, Islamic terrorists are probably the most hated and certainly the most feared. For the better part of this decade, the stated goal of America has been to hunt down and bring terrorists to justice (torture and kill them). Toby Keith wrote songs about it. Entire industries have emerged with business models that include killing terrorists and protecting Americans from the ones that get away.

And for the last year or so, there exists an unstoppable whisper campaign implying that Senator Obama is a terrorist whose goal it is to seize our government in the name of al-Qaeda. It’s not just the e-mails and the peawits who believe them, either. Everyone from Ann Coulter to Mitt Romney to TIME Magazine’s very serious Mark Halperin are helping to spread this dangerous filth.

The rumor doesn’t merely repeat what Republicans have said about everyone from Senator Kerry to Max Cleland — that the Democrats want the terrorists to win, or that they’re “with the terrorists.” This new thing with Senator Obama is much more insidious as it literally paints Senator Obama as an actual terrorist. Not an enabler or appeaser — but literally as a member of our nation’s mortal enemy. And so if it’s our goal to bring terrorists to justice (kill, torture, etc…), this ridiculous and so-far-fetched-it’s-insane-how-many-stupid-people-believe-it rumor puts Senator Obama and his family at risk of being targeted by an unhinged far-right zealot who has “kill ’em all, and let God sort them out” tattooed across his forehead.

The challenge, then, is to somehow combat the insanity of the whisper campaign without making matters worse and putting the Obamas in further danger. Without the correct tone, we run the risk of feeding the rumor rather than killing it. As such, the only way to kill a flesh-eating virus of these proportions is to employ some artful semantic construction and, in the case of this New Yorker cover, much much much better satire. So yes, it’s satire. But it’s really bad satire.

The problem with the New Yorker cover isn’t that it shows Senator Obama in a turban and all the rest of it. The problem is that the cartoon totally fails to underscore who and what’s being satirized. The people worthy of satire aren’t the Obamas, but rather the asshats who are actively passing off this crap as the truth. To that point, I can understand what the artist, Barry Blitt who is otherwise an amazing illustrator, was getting at. By publishing such a drawing, the New Yorker “becomes” the rumor spreader, even though it’s really not. But such a complex meta-joke is, firstly, tricky to accomplish, and, secondly, too abstract to adequately smack down the gargantuan size and volume of these rumors. So the point is lost without the benefit of the “it’s about scare tactics” press release, and the cartoon fails. But, unfortunately, such a failure risks the illustration ultimately becoming part of the rumor it seeks to expose.

In other words, without reading the article, any given yokel will see the cover (as it’s aired around the clock on cable news) and think, “Hey Jessup! Lookie yonder! This here drawing shows Hoo-Sane is a Muslim terrrrst. I knew it!”

(more…)

Read Full Post »

By- Suzie-Q @ 12:00 PM MST

Despite Aversion To Golfing During The War, Bush Will Attend A McCain Golf Fundraiser Hosted By His Parents

Think Progress- By Amanda at 11:36 am

In May, President Bush revealed that he had given up playing golf because of the Iraq war. “I think playing golf during a war just sends the wrong signal,” said Bush. Apparently though, he’s fine with golf as long as it raises money for GOP candidates.

The DC Examiner reports that next Monday, Bush’s parents will be hosting a high-dollar golfing fundraiser for Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) near their home in Kennebunkport, ME:

According to a solicitation sent by the McCain camp, for the low, low price of $5,000, you can play a round of golf at Cape Arundel Golf Course, Bush’s home course.

Both President Bush and Governor Jeb Bush will be stopping by to greet the foursomes,” the missive promises. “The course is reserved for this private group, and VIPs will be visiting during your round of golf. This event is a great way to end a weekend getaway, and we would be honored if you can attend.”

It’s unclear what Bush will do while everyone else is ignoring the war and golfing. Perhaps he’ll ride around in golf carts or simply make swinging motions with his arms.

No word on whether Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice will attend but she may, considering that golf helps her while she’s “trying to stay in shape.” As ThinkProgress reported, Rice recently told the Golf Channel that despite the fact that Bush has given up golf to honor U.S. troops, she has been “playing and playing a lot” since the war began.

McCain also seems to have few qualms about golfing during wartime. In fact, on his campaign website, he sells golfing gear.

Read Full Post »

Bush Lifts Ban On Offshore Oil Drilling

By- Suzie-Q @ 9:45 AM MST

Bush lifts his father’s ban on offshore oil drilling

Think Progress- By Satyam at 11:08 am

Just one month after John McCain flip-flopped and called for lifting the ban on offshore oil drilling, President Bush will announce later today that he too will flip-flop and “lift an executive ban on offshore drilling that has stood since his father was president.” Bush and McCain supported the ban when running for president in 2000. The White House says it is trying to get Congress to agree to increase drilling:

But Perino said Bush no longer wants to wait. She pinned blame on the leaders of the Democratic Congress for inaction. ”They haven’t even held a single hearing,” Perino said. ”So we are going to move forward, and hopefully that will spur action by the Congress.”

Asked if Bush’s action alone will lead to more oil drilling, Perino said, “In terms of allowing more exploration to go forward? No, it does not.”

White House officials acknowledge that Bush’s calls for expanded drilling will not “have immediate impact on prices at the pump.”

Read Full Post »

FDIC Down 10%…Banks Really Nervous!!

GEF @ 12:05 PM EDT

Crisis Deepens as Big Bank Fails

IndyMac Seized In Largest Bust In Two Decades
By DAMIAN PALETTA and DAVID ENRICH

IndyMac Bank, a prolific mortgage specialist that helped fuel the housing boom, was seized Friday by federal regulators, in the third-largest bank failure in U.S. history.

IndyMac is the biggest mortgage lender to go under since a fall in housing prices and surge in defaults began rippling through the economy last year — and it likely won’t be the last. Banking regulators are bracing for a slew of failures over the next year as analysts say housing prices have yet to bottom out.

The collapse is expected to cost the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. between $4 billion and $8 billion, potentially wiping out more than 10% of the FDIC’s $53 billion deposit-insurance fund.

The Pasadena, Calif., thrift was one of the largest savings and loans in the country, with about $32 billion in assets. It now joins an infamous list of collapsed banks, topped by Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co., which failed in 1984 with $40 billion of assets. The second-largest failure was American Savings & Loan Association of Stockton, Calif., in 1988.

The director of the Office of Thrift Supervision, John Reich, blamed IndyMac’s failure on comments made in late June by Sen. Charles Schumer (D., N.Y.), who sent a letter to the regulator raising concerns about the bank’s solvency. In the following 11 days, spooked depositors withdrew a total of $1.3 billion. Mr. Reich said Sen. Schumer gave the bank a “heart attack.”

“Would the institution have failed without the deposit run?” Mr. Reich asked reporters. “We’ll never know the answer to that question.”

Mr. Schumer quickly fired back.

“If OTS had done its job as regulator and not let IndyMac’s poor and loose lending practices continue, we wouldn’t be where we are today,” Sen. Schumer said. “Instead of pointing false fingers of blame, OTS should start doing its job to prevent future IndyMacs.”

IndyMac had been troubled for months, and investors were concerned about its possible downfall well before Sen. Schumer’s comments. It specialized in Alt-A loans, a type of mortgage that can often be offered to borrowers who don’t fully document their incomes or assets. The company sold most of the loans it originated, but continued to hold some on its books. As defaults piled up, IndyMac’s finances deteriorated.

The bank will be run by the FDIC and reopen Monday. The FDIC typically insures up to $100,000 per depositor. IndyMac had roughly $19 billion of deposits. Nearly $1 billion of those deposits were uninsured, affecting about 10,000 people, the FDIC said.

IndyMac’s arc — rapid growth, followed by an even more rapid descent — is a microcosm of the mortgage industry. It boomed in the first part of this decade, as investors were willing to fund loans on ever-looser terms, then hit hard times when the housing market began to turn down in late 2006.

Small mortgage lenders started going under quickly, with the number of failures climbing into the hundreds. Now the fallout has spread world-wide, bringing down some of America’s largest financial institutions. Bear Stearns Cos., which suffered losses on mortgage-related investments, underwent a meltdown in March and had to be rescued by J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.

Countrywide Financial Corp., at one time the nation’s largest mortgage lender, saw its stock price plunge this year and was forced to sell itself to Bank of America Corp. at a firesale price.

IndyMac, in a last-ditch effort to fend off collapse after it failed to raise fresh capital, said this past week it was firing more than half its work force and closing most of its lending operations. While its shares had been tumbling since early 2007, the move was nonetheless jarring for a company that ranked as the ninth-largest U.S. mortgage lender last year in terms of loan volume, according to trade publication Inside Mortgage Finance.

IndyMac is one of the few federally insured banks to fail in recent years. Banking regulators are bulking up their staff of bank examiners and taking a tough approach toward banks that are seen as risky.

Mr. Reich, the thrift regulator, noted that the IndyMac case had some “unique” features, including the involvement of Sen. Schumer and the rapid fall in its deposits. Officials said most of the recent withdrawals came from depositors at branches, rather than those making deposits at IndyMac’s online bank.

IndyMac was set up by Countrywide in 1985, but the two companies severed ties in 1997 and became direct competitors. The company’s name stands for Independent National Mortgage. It was created to specialize in jumbo mortgages — those that are too big to be sold to government-backed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In 1997, under the direction of Chief Executive Michael Perry, a protege of Countrywide chief Angelo Mozilo, IndyMac set off on its own.

The company grew quickly, pioneering the issuance of so-called Alt-A mortgages to people with blemished credit histories. The loans have gained notoriety as an example of the type of lax lending that came to characterize much of the mortgage industry.

Early last year, Mr. Perry remained optimistic about IndyMac’s future, insisting that the company had the resources to remain independent. At the time, IndyMac’s stock was trading for about $45 a share.

But the combination of the frozen credit markets and mounting defaults on IndyMac loans steadily sapped investor confidence in the company. In February, IndyMac reported the first annual loss in its 23-year history. By this week, its shares, which ended last year at less than $7 each, were trading for 28 cents apiece.

The company was desperate for more capital but couldn’t find investors willing to put fresh funds into what looked like a crippled institution.

The failure could be felt across the entire banking industry, as the FDIC will likely have to raise insurance assessments for all banks to build up government reserves. “It takes a big chunk out of the FDIC insurance fund,” said Chip MacDonald, a banking lawyer at law firm Jones Day. He said that if the FDIC hikes insurance fees, that will add to already-intense pressure on bank profits.

The OTS and FDIC didn’t secure any outside firm to acquire the bank’s assets. The FDIC will temporarily run the bank through a new bank it has created, called IndyMac Federal Bank, FSB.

Read Full Post »

Mukasey: Bush’s New ‘Mr. Cover-up’

Sudhan @11:30 CET

Robert Parry | Consortiumnews.com, July 10, 2008

Even Sen. Charles Schumer, whose vote last year ensured Michael Mukasey’s confirmation as Attorney General, was left sputtering as Mukasey returned the favor by rebuffing Schumer’s concerns about the Bush administration’s political prosecutions.

At the end of his round of Senate Judiciary Committee questions, Schumer referred to allegations that White House political adviser Karl Rove had pressed for the selective prosecution of Alabama’s Democratic Gov. Don Siegelman, who was viewed as a threat to Republican dominance of the South.

“Do you think that someone in the Justice Department should ask Karl Rove whether he was involved, whether he did the things that are alleged – someone somewhere – or is there a possibility that no one should ever ask him?” the New York Democrat said, his voice rising.

Mukasey responded coolly that he would not endorse the questioning of Rove. In disgust, Schumer said, “I find these answers very disappointing.”

But Schumer was not alone. At the oversight hearings on July 9, the committee’s Democrats and the ranking Republican, Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, voiced varying levels of disappointment at Mukasey’s refusal to look back at the misconduct – including criminal acts – that had occurred earlier in the Bush administration.

Indeed, Mukasey’s evasive answers recalled the stonewalling of his predecessor, Alberto Gonzales. Mukasey’s vague and meandering responses made two things clear, however: George W. Bush’s hubris about what he sees as his unlimited presidential powers continues and Mukasey will serve as Bush’s rearguard protector during his final six months in office.

In a separate confrontation with two House committees, Mukasey has promulgated a novel legal theory justifying his refusal to release FBI reports on interviews with President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney about their roles in exposing the identity of CIA officer Valerie Plame.

Even though Bush has not asserted executive privilege regarding the FBI reports, Mukasey has refused to honor subpoenas from the House committees on the grounds that to do so would threaten “core Executive Branch confidentiality interests and fundamental separation of powers principles.”

Mukasey’s theory ignores a variety of precedents, including the public release of criminal-case testimony by Bush’s three predecessors (Bill Clinton on the Monica Lewinsky case, George H.W. Bush on the Passportgate affair and the Iran-Contra scandal, and Ronald Reagan on Iran-Contra.)

Nuremberg Defense

In his Senate testimony, Mukasey also left no doubt that the Justice Department would take no action against anyone in the administration who violated criminal statutes in the “war on terror” if they were following legal advice from superiors, a modern version of the so-called Nuremberg defense.

Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Illinois, urged Mukasey to “follow what I think is the clear standard of the law within your own department and initiate those investigations” into the Bush administration’s abuse of detainees, including the use of “waterboarding,” a form of simulated drowning.

Durbin noted that retired Major General Antonio Taguba, who was in charge of the Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse probe, stated recently that “the Commander in Chief and those under him authorized a systematic regime of torture” and that “there is no longer any doubt about whether the current administration committed war crimes, the only question that remains is whether those who ordered the use of torture will be held accountable.”

Mukasey, however, responded that anyone who acted in “good faith” and relied on the Justice Department’s legal advice “cannot and should not be prosecuted.” The same protection should cover government lawyers who gave the advice, he said.

Continued . . .

Read Full Post »