by Geezer Power…9:22 pm
Another clear cut case of the media on 9/11/01 being fed a cover story on WTC-7’s collapse before the actual event. In this clip, the anchors for FOX-5 in Washington DC on 9/11/01 report that WTC-7 had already collapsed and then they watch WTC-7 collapse seconds in their own video footage just after they already reported that the collapse already happened. This is more evidence that WTC-7 was brought down in a controlled demolition. How could anyone know a building with light fire damage is too collapse at free fall speed, unless they know it is going to be brought down with explosives?
Hmm, I don’t think Arthur is going to like this…G:
Hmmm, maybe these Faux News mouthpieces were in contact with Rudy…G:
First of all the Fox news report showed a video of Building 7’s collapse. The reporter mentions that it’s a video twice in the story.
The BBC story was different in that they did announce over the air that the building collapsed before it happened. Remember there was a large gouge taken out of the south wall of Building 7 by the exterior columns of Tower 1 pealing out from the collapsing Tower and there was also extensive damage to the south west corner. Several large fires grew out of control within Building 7 and after a survey of the building by the F.D. showed a wall near the southwest corner bulging outward no doubt from expanding floors, and with no readily available water to fight the fires due to destruction of the water mains, the Fire Chief in command ordered an evacuation of the building.
With all the commotion at ground zero and determination by the Fire Commander that the building might collapse and the necessity to evacuate a large area ‘collapse zone’ around the building, everyone including reporters were ordered out of the ‘collapse zone’ and someone must have assumed and reported over the air that the building definitely was going to collapse. It’s a short jump for the BBC reporter to mishear the report and assume that the building already had collapsed.
Remember it was a highly emotional time and there was even an assumption that someone heard a ‘countdown’ allegedly because a Red Cross worker had his hand over his radio and the person assumed he was trying to cover up the countdown.
Relax Arthur, it’s only one small piece of evidence. Wait untill there is a real investigation and the rest of the evidence is presented… 😉
Gosh Arthur, I thought that all you were concerned with was “Fire in the Skyscraper”…G:?
I dunno G:, I don’t foresee any investigations because WTC 7 and the other buildings’ metal skeletons were melted by jet fuel according to the coincidence/random occurrence theorists at N.I.S.T.
Right Arthur?
BTW, I work with calibrations and I deal with N.I.S.T. scientists quite often.
They’re no help most of the time and I usually end up answering my own questions.
I’m not impressed with any N.I.S.T. findings.
Well, there are actually three News Videos that all show the same information.
Fox, CNN, and BBC News
When has this administration ever told the truth about anything that can be verified?
Why then should we believe a word they say about 911 events?
Anyone with a mind that has looked into this at all should realize 911 was an inside job. The evidence is overwelming. The administration got caught in too many lies that can be verified. The official story does not add up.
Dad2059.
No one in NIST said that the steel “melted”. Steel bar joists unless they are protected by insulation fail in 10 minutes under fire conditions. Using bar joists to build the floors in a 110 story sky-scraper is folly. The floors failed and pulled in the support walls. No one in the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth seems to have learned this lesson.
Arthur
While it’s true that the NIST never said that, it’s also true that the steel did indeed melt.
Remember that there is evidence of this in the NYPD Museum…G:
911 artifacts of melted concrete & steel