FDL- Lisa Derrick Sunday June 20, 2010 1:22 pm
Two ago weeks Senator Joe “Turncoat” Lieberman, along with Maine’s Sen. Susan Collins and Sen. Tom Carper of Delaware proposed the Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act, an internet kill switch which any POTUS, any time could flick to shut off the Intertoobs. And keep them shut off indefinitely. Much outrage and uproar ensued.
Sunday on CNN Loserman tried to explain that what he had in mind was not a total “All Your Base Are Belong to Us” move, but rather a partial Internet shut down. And why? Because other countries already have that in place and we have to keep up with the Hu Jintaos?
Right now China, the government, can disconnect parts of its Internet in case of war and we need to have that here too.
Wait, wut? Haven’t we been busy decrying actions like that as being all mean and stuff, and talking about how awful it that China can’t have Google or goatse, like real a democracy? And how it sucked that Pakistan shut down Facebook and Google on “Everybody Draw Mohammad Day”?
Lieberman goes on to explain that people are just over reacting and that the bill not censorship. Oh rilly? Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset would force private websites to comply with broad cybersecurity measures and allow the President to disconnect Internet networks. The president’s power to shut down parts of the Web could be renewed indefinitely under the bill.
But it’s not a big deal, says Lieberman:
We need this capacity in a time of war. We need the capacity for the president to say, ‘Internet service provider, we’ve got to disconnect the American Internet from all traffic coming in from another foreign country, or we have to put a patch on this part of it’.
So I say to my friends on the Internet, relax. Take a look at the bill. And this is something that we need to protect our country.
Lieberman seems like he’s trying to sell this piece of legislation as (thought process/spin):
Oh noes, nasty people could mess with the internets and use them to cause and spread misinformation.
Well, yeah, and how is that different from our not-so upheavally present day?
Please email your senators on both side of the aisle with your opinions on the matter.
[HT: Raw Story]