Archive for February 21st, 2008

By- Suzie-Q @ 7:55 PM MST

MCain’s Ties To Lobbyists = Telecom Immunity

By- Anacher Forester

Everyone’s all a titter about Sen. John McCain’s “inappropriate relationship” with lobbyist Vicki Iseman. I personally could care less whether or not the self-confessed Senior Adulterer from Arizona and Iseman are romantically entangled (other than the mere thought of McCain entangling anything with anyone completely creeps me out).

As the Amazing Digby points out It’s Not About The Sex…it’s about the favors. McCain’s unswerving support of Iseman’s telecom clients included championing bills to end big time evangelical Bud Paxson’s (Ion Television formerly Paxson Communications) and others’ fight to force cable to run his broadcast stations or to provide minority ownership tax breaks for Cunningham Broadcasting (née Glencairn, LTD — the shell corp. owned and operated by the evil John Kerry-swiftboating Sinclair empire to avoid FCC ownership regs). McCain not so coincidentally spearheaded a ton of broadcast industry deregulation that led to the MSM mess we now endure.

However, this goes deeper than McCain’s favoritism and reciprocal of use of their corporate jets and other stuff. The aforementioned NY Times piece points out just how far Johnny Boy’s super-cozyness with lobbyists goes:

Like other presidential candidates, he has relied on lobbyists to run his campaigns. Since a cash crunch last summer, several of them — including his campaign manager, Rick Davis, who represented companies before Mr. McCain’s Senate panel — have been working without pay, a gift that could be worth tens of thousands of dollars.

In recent weeks, Mr. McCain has hired another lobbyist, Mark Buse, to run his Senate office. In his case, it was a round trip through the revolving door: Mr. Buse had directed Mr. McCain’s committee staff for seven years before leaving in 2001 to lobby for telecommunications companies.
(my emphasis)

Shee-it! As HuffPo noted last year McCain’s team is fucking riddled with lobbyists! Forget about any rumored romance with Iseman, even at work Johnny beds lobbyists! Mark Buse is notorious as one of the two lobbyists secretly hired by former CPB Chair/Karl Rove amigo/Republican tool Ken Tomlinson to quash attempts to seat more actual broadcasters on the PBS board.

It turns out McCain 2008 campaign manager Rick Davis is even more controversial. Last month the WaPo hit Rick Davis for setting up a McCain meet with gangster-linked Putin-pal billionaire Russian tycoon Oleg Deripaska. At the time Davis was still at his own lobby firm Davis Manafort where his biggest clients were telecom giants SBC Global AT&T and Verizon. According to Open Secrets between 1998-99 & 2003-05 Davis Manafort raked in at total of $670,000 SBC Global AT&T bucks. From 2003-2005 Verizon tossed him a cool $540,000.

While Iseman and Buse do not seem to have di interest in telecom immunity, McCain 2008 Campaign Manager Rick Davis sure does. “Straight Talk” McCain’s recent vote to keep telecom immunity in Bush’s wiretapping bill appears not like a vote to keep us safer but a vote for Davis‘ once and future clients. McCain’s continued support of telecom immunity is a fait accompli.

This raises the question: In what other ways would “Honest Johnny” McCain favor the special interests he used to rail against once he’s President and at what cost to the average citizen?

Let’s all agree right now to not find out. Please.

Read Full Post »

Pentagon: “Target that Space Satellite and Fire!”

GEF @ 5:18 PM MST

US 193 Terminated Satellite 130 Miles Above the Pacific… Next Stop for the MIC(Military Industrial Complex)… Star Wars Empire!

Read Full Post »

By- Suzie-Q @ 5:15 PM MST

Federal agents are investigating whether former Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott knowingly played a role in an alleged conspiracy in 2006 to influence a Mississippi judge presiding over a multimillion-dollar lawsuit against famed plaintiff attorney Richard “Dickie” Scruggs, according to people familiar with the situation.
Mr. Scruggs and several associates are scheduled to stand trial March 31 on charges that they offered $40,000 in bribes to State Court Judge Henry L. Lackey in return for a favorable ruling in a lawsuit against Mr. Scruggs over $26.5 million in legal fees.

Mr. Lott, who is a brother-in-law to Mr. Scruggs, unexpectedly …


Read Full Post »

Iraq, Israel and WMD dossier

Sudhan @23:20 CET

Chris Amis | New Statesman, February 21, 2008

A scribbled reference to Israel in the margin of a withheld draft of the Iraq dossier is revealed. Chris Ames who has doggedly pursued the government on the issue responds

The Guardian has today revealed the contents of the margin note that the Information Tribunal allowed to be removed when ordering the Foreign Office to publish the John Williams draft of the Iraq dossier.

It reveals that a senior government official or minister suggested at the time of the dossier (September 2002) that Israel had brazenly flouted the UN’s authority in pursuit of weapons of mass destruction. A reference to Israel in the margins of the Williams draft is linked to an assertion in the text that Iraq is unique in this respect. It is clear that the author of the reference thought that the same charge might be levelled against Israel.

The Guardian has obtained a copy of the witness statement given to the Tribunal by Neil Wigan, Head of the Foreign Office’s Arab, Israel and North Africa Group. He told the Tribunal:

“I interpret this note to indicate that the person who wrote it believes that Israel has flouted the United Nations authority in a manner similar to that of the Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein.”

Wigan asserted that the comment would ‘seriously damage Britain’s bilateral relationship with Israel’. He stated that Israel would believe that the FCO had compared it with Saddam Hussein’s regime and that this would confirm its view that elements of the FCO are prejudiced against it.

I attended the Tribunal hearing in December and was aware that Wigan was giving evidence in secret. When the Tribunal issued its decision last month it ordered that the note should be removed from the document, which was finally published on Monday. It also kept secret its reason for doing so, although it stated that it related to the exemption under Section 27 of the Freedom of Information Act, that publication would damage international relations.

When Jack Straw, then Foreign Secretary, originally blocked my 2005 FOI request for the Williams draft, he made no mention of this exemption, relying instead on the Section 36 exemption relating to government confidentiality.

The Foreign Office has refused to say who wrote the marginal note, saying that it does not comment on leaked documents. It is clear from documents on the Hutton Inquiry website that Straw was one of a small number of people within the Foreign Office who followed the drafting of the dossier at this time. He almost certainly saw the Williams draft, which the FCO described as ‘advice to ministers’.

Labour MP Lynne Jones said: “The Government’s timid refusal to make an accurate reference to Israel’s flouting of UN authority over its WMD shows their lack of objectivity on breaches of international law, which damages our Country’s moral authority.

“The reticence over this issue is mirrored by the unwillingness to push for enforcement of human rights provisions of the EU-Israel Association Agreement.”
Plus don’t miss Martin Bright’s analysis The truth is more tawdry than the lies

Read Full Post »

Cindy McCain Is No Barbie

By- Suzie-Q @ 1:00 PM MST

She has a name and it’s not Barbie

From: 23/6

February 20, 2008

There’s more to Cindy McCain than meets the serial-killer blue eye

Cindy McCain inserted herself into the flap over Michelle Obama’s supposedly anti-American comments, telling supporters in Wisconsin, “I’m proud of my country, I don’t know about you, if you heard those words earlier.” Left-wing blog Daily Kos returned fire with a detailed history of Cindy McCain’s problems with Percocet.

Since this is the first time Cindy has piped up in this campaign, it’s time to ask—who is this GOP frontrunner’s wife? And how can she be distinguished from her doppelgangers, which include every man’s second wife and Jessica Lange’s character in “Blue Skies”? 23/6 investigates.

Read Full Post »

Bush’s Life of Constitutional Crime: Lies and Spies

anthony @ 19:55 GMT

PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS | Counterpunch | Wednesday, February 20, 2008

President George W. Bush and his director of National Intelligence, Mike McConnell, are telling the American people that an unaccountable executive branch is necessary for their protection. Without the Protect America Act, Bush and McConnell claim, the executive branch will not be able to spy on terrorists, and we will all be blown up. Terrorists can only be stopped, Bush says, if Bush has the right to spy on everyone without any oversight by courts.

The fight over the Protect America Act has everything to do with our safety, only not in the way that Bush and McConnell assert.

Bush says the Democrats have put “our country more in danger of an attack” by letting the Protect America Act lapse. This claim is nonsense. The 30 year old Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act gives the executive branch all the power it needs to spy on terrorists. (more…)

Read Full Post »

By- Suzie-Q @ 11:00 AM MST

The 2008 presidential race must be an incredibly welcome development for President Bush and his White House. That’s because the American body politic can only really focus on one thing at a time, and so there’s little time for anything else aside from the madcap antics of of Gilligan, the Skipper, the Millionaire and his wife, the Movie Star, the Professor and Mary Ann…and the rest. Some liberal blogs and right-wing talk radio are lined up in circular firing squads, and the op-ed columnists have trained their fire on Hillary’s lonely teardrops or Barack’s Church of the Poison Mind.

While no one was looking, the economy nosedived, gas prices have soared, the war in Iraq is as unpopular as ever and Osama bin Laden is still on the loose. And so while none of us were paying attention, our 43rd president just hit a major milestone.

George W. Bush is now the most unpopular president in recorded American history. (h/t Atrios)

Worse than Richard Nixon in the days before he resigned in disgrace during Watergate, worse than Jimmy Carter during the Iran hostage crisis, much worse than Bill Clinton when he was impeached. Just as Roger Bannister raced through what once seemed the unreachable 4-minute mile, Bush has burst through a barrier once also thought impossible, below the 20-percent mark.


Read Full Post »

Time For Bill O’Racist To Resign In Disgrace

by Bob Cesca @ 11:18 AM (EST)

A cursory internet search reveals the shocking truth for those of us who weren’t there: photographs depicting a variety of howling posses composed of fire-eyed redneck thugs — terrorists, if you will — skulking through the woods with hounds and lengths of rope; hauling with them an American citizen of African descent, and making their way to a not-so-clandestine location where a cowardly, ritualistic, vigilante execution will take place.

Sepia-toned photographs retaining in permanent clarity the faces — the proud, grinning white “men” gathered like hyenas around the mangled corpse of a black man who had been beaten and hanged by these reactionary monsters. As if the deeds themselves weren’t shameful enough, these ghoulish lynch mobs would often take away souvenirs of their homicides: body parts, clothing, hair — and those terrible photographs.

There are too many of these images. There are too many stories — more than enough justify any thinking-person’s reluctance to pledge unconditional pride in the entirety our national heritage — a heritage which includes a 1922 U.S. Senate filibuster against an anti-lynching law.

This isn’t ancient history. These aren’t isolated incidents. Perhaps as many as 4,000 American blacks were lynched in the eight decades following the end of the Civil War.

Similar events, in practice and symbolism, occur even today. As recently as last year, nooses were used to intimidate African-Americans. The noose, it seems, has become a newsworthy issue in the fourth American century. Almost exactly ten years ago, in 1998, a black man was tied up and dragged behind a pick-up truck in Jasper, Texas until his body was so decimated it was practically unrecognizable as being the remains of a man.

So there’s no reason why Bill O’Reilly should be surprised when reasonable, rational, thinking Americans want him to be summarily fired for using the word “lynching” in the context of a rant about Michelle Obama. The outrage is righteous and justified. Words matter. And history shows that these words that Bill O’Reilly invoked carry a long, sinister shadow.

You’ve probably read the quote here and on other websites, but I want to make sure Bill O’Reilly’s bigotry is seared into the record, so I’ll post it here again:

And I don’t want to go on a lynching party against Michelle Obama unless there’s evidence, hard facts, that say this is how the woman really feels. If that’s how she really feels — that America is a bad country or a flawed nation, whatever — then that’s legit. We’ll track it down.

Lynching? Party? Unless there’s evidence? So we’re to understand from Bill O’Reilly that if someone might be (and she wasn’t) relating a level of dissatisfaction with America’s present status and chief executive, that they deserve to be tracked down by Bill O’Reilly’s Lynch Mob?

Cross posted at- Bob Cesca’s Goddamn Awesome Blog! GO! and Huffington Post


Read Full Post »

McCain’s Troubles…

By- Suzie-Q @ 8:45 AM MST

H/T to Paddy at Cliff Schecter

Because it made me smile even before my coffee.

More great pics here.

P.S.-If you can, you should really be watching C-Span where they are discussing McCain’s troubles. Exceptionally fiesty crazy this morning.

Read Full Post »

McCain’s blonde bombshell

by Geezer Power ….8:29 am

Article from: Herald Sun

Stefanie Balogh

February 22, 2008 12:00am

REPUBLICAN John McCain has denied bombshell allegations romantically linking him to a female political lobbyist eight years ago.

Senator McCain yesterday described as a “smear campaign” a report in The New York Times that alleges during his first run for the White House he was allegedly involved with 40-year-old blonde Vicki Iseman.

His aides at the time were so convinced the relationship had become romantic they blocked the Washington lobbyist’s access to Senator McCain, warned her to keep away and intervened to “protect the candidate from himself”, the Times reported.

It anonymously quoted two of Senator McCain’s former associates, who said they “joined in a series of confrontations” and warned him he was risking the 2000 campaign and his career.

“Both said Mr McCain acknowledged behaving inappropriately and pledged to keep his distance from Ms Iseman,” the report said. The senator lost the 2000 nomination to George Bush.

Senator McCain, married to second wife Cindy McCain, and Ms Iseman denied they were ever romantically involved, or that Senator McCain had shown her or her telecommunications clients any favouritism when he chaired the powerful Senate commerce committee.

The Times had been sitting on the story for several weeks, and apparently chose not to run the expose before the Iowa and New Hampshire presidential nominating contests in January after intense lobbying from the McCain camp.

McCain Under Fire ~MSNBC VIDEO~

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

%d bloggers like this: