Archive for June 12th, 2007

by Mentarch … 23:20 EDT

(The following constitutes the last part of a short three-part series on evolution)

So far, I have endeavored to disassemble two of the favorite (non)arguments of fundamentalists and denialists against the reality of the process of evolution – namely, A) that humans have remained essentially unchanged since Creation; and B) that the science underlying evolution is wrong/invalid.

Mind you – notwithstanding that I so endeavored by using a tongue-in-cheek-with-a-wink approach, the facts provided in these two previous entries of mine remain soundly grounded in reality and scientific accuracy (taking into account that I have to vulgarize the science at the same time).

It is therefore with the same approach that I intend today to disassemble a third favorite myth of the fundamentalists and denialists typically used in their (intellectual sloth-driven and ignorance-based) attempt at “disproving” evolution: there is no randomness and no natural selection in life.

Now, I’ve already discussed one recent example of random mutations followed by selection so as to provide an evolutionary advantage in humans – therefore, I will not dwell again on this.

Rather, I will focus on randomness. To whit (one zany example among so many – emphasis mine):


Read Full Post »

Evening Jukebox… Hard Times Come Easy

by- Suzie-Q @ 8:03 PM MST
Richie Sambora – Hard Times Come Easy

Read Full Post »

by GEF @ 8:05 PM EDT

Our Leaders are Blackmailed. Our Democracy Subverted, Our Courts and the Justice Dept is made a Mockery of. Now the Final Treason is being put together in order to Subvert our National Sovereignty! Are you ready to live in the Third world version of the USA?!
It’s almost here! – GEF


By: Devvy
June 11, 2007

© 2007 – NewsWithViews.com

“The true barriers of our liberty in this country are our State governments; and the wisest conservative power ever contrived by man is that of which our Revolution and present government found us possessed.” –Thomas Jefferson to A. L. C. Destutt de Tracy, 1811. ME 13:19

Americans who are following the rapid and calculated destruction of these sovereign united states of America are fully aware of what the North American Union means along with it’s enforcement maze deceptively titled the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America.

Go See—>

Read Full Post »

by- Mentarch … 20:00 EDT

(The following entry constitutes the second part of a short three-part series on evolution, with a tongue-in-cheek approach. Part one can be read here)

Fundamentalists and other denialists of the process of evolution are fond of arguing that it is an invalid science, seeking to undermine it with either theological, ideological or philosophical (non)arguments (three examples among so many here, here and here), or outright non-science, pseudo-science and quackery – like intelligent design or creationism science.

As I put it before: only science is science.

Interestingly, it is a truism that all scientific disciplines are related in various degrees (and I should know, considering what I do for a living – nonetheless, see these two examples here and here, in case you do not believe me). Hence, that is why the fundamentalist/denialist (non)argument that evolution science is invalid, or wrong, is the most ludicrous of them all – not only for its (ahem) fundamental fallacious nature but also for its grave implications.

Not sure? Then allow me to make a list of the scientific disciplines (and/or subdisciplines) which underlie the science of evolution:


Read Full Post »

by GEF @ 6:00 PM EDT


The Public is Clearly and Overwhelmingly against the War in Iraq and on Giving Illegals Amnesty and yet G.W. Bush is forcing his GOP party to follow his stubborn lead into Political Oblivion! – GEF

GOP senators getting visit from boss on immigration

With more Republican allies, Bush could help revive the stalled reform proposal.

WASHINGTON — For just the second time in his presidency, President Bush will travel up to Capitol Hill today to meet with Republican senators at their weekly policy luncheon — a visit designed to underscore his commitment to legislation that is increasingly important to his legacy, particularly immigration reform.

Go See—>

Read Full Post »

The Bombed Bridges of Baghdad

by- Suzie-Q @ 1:19 PM MST


by- Larry C. Johnson

Unlike the film, The Bridges of Madison County, the bombed bridges of Baghdad are not a quaint romantic tale, but a warning sign of potential disaster for U.S. forces in Iraq. The ongoing attacks on bridges in and around Baghdad creates significant risks and logistical obstacles for U.S. forces in Iraq. In my opinion these attacks are part of deliberate strategy to create ambush chokepoints, degrade the capability of U.S. Quick Reaction Forces, and enhance the ability of insurgent forces to cut the U.S. lines of communication.

Juan Cole summarizes the latest activity:

Guerrillas blew up another bridge in Iraq on Monday, this time over the Euphrates in Diyala province. Its destruction will make drivers from northeastern Diyala who want to go to Baghdad take a route through Baquba, among the more violent cities in Iraq. Guerrillas are attempting to cause Iraqi society and government to collapse by hitting the infrastructure, and the bridge demolitions are part of that strategy. Late on Sunday, an overpass leading to a bridge south of Baghdad was destroyed, and 3 American soldiers were killed and 6 wounded.

These attacks continue a trend that started in April, with the attack on the Sarafiya Bridge in central Baghdad (see U.S. Policy in the Drink). The loss of these bridges represent more than increased inconvenience for commuters and travelers.


Read Full Post »

by Geezer Power …11:47 AM PDT

Consider the source here. Has this educated pawn of the Corporate Government been truthful to “We The People” or has she parroted the agenda of Bush & Co. since her first day in office. What we have here is a crony of “The Commander Guy”, kinda like a cartoon character that we are supposed to believe is a benevolent leader… Glargh… puke… And a bunch of ideologues who support him and are telling us he is above the law, as well as whomever is serving him. It took years and untold amounts of money and energy to finally prosecute one of these evil crooks, and Condosleazy has the gall to ask for sympathy for Scooter. Why in the hell is he still out of jail? Because our installed Faux Republican White house is above the law, and answers to nobody, especially the American People. They have no honor, pride, or redeeming qualities, and will be there until they are drug from their dark corners kicking and screaming in a frenzy of disharmonious self righteousness like the world has never seen.

Editor and Publisher

Condoleezza Rice, Meeting With ‘WSJ’ Editorial Board, Gives Props to Scooter Libby

By E&P Staff

Published: June 11, 2007 4:00 PM ET

NEW YORK Meeting with the Wall Street Journal’s editorial board, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said that Lewis “Scooter” Libby, who promoted the invasion of Iraq, disclosed the name of a cover CIA agent then was convicted of four counts of perjury and obstruction of justice, had “served the country really well.” She hinted that a presidential pardon was in order.

Asked for her views on a pardon, Rice demurred but then came to the strong defense of Libby, stating that he should be treated “in accordance” with his public service. He was sentenced to 30 months in prison last week, convicted on four felony counts, despite letters of support from many highly-placed figures ranging from Henry Kissinger to Gen. Peter Pace.

The transcript of that part of the Friday interview follows. It has been posted at the Online Journal.

QUESTION: In today’s Wall Street Journal there’s an article by Fouad Ajami making the analogy that — basically saying that the President’s reluctance to pardon Scooter Libby is akin to leaving a wounded soldier on the battlefield. What do you think of that analogy?

SECRETARY RICE: Look, I’m not going to get involved in trying to give the President advice on how he ought to think about this. You know, he has to think about what he wants to do.

QUESTION: What’s your own opinion?

SECRETARY RICE: You know that…

QUESTION: You think he should go to jail?

SECRETARY RICE: Look, let me tell you what I think about Scooter Libby. I think he’s served the country really well. I think he did it to the best of his ability. I think that he is going through an extremely difficult time with his family and for him. And you know, I’m just desperately sorry that it’s happening to him and I — you know, the legal system has spoken, but I tell you, this is a really good guy who is a good public servant and ought to be treated in accordance with that.

Read Full Post »

An Open Letter To Joe Klein

by- Actor212 @ 2:45 PM EDT

Fury begets fury. Poison from the right-wing talk shows seeped into the Republican Party’s bloodstream and sent that party off the deep end. Limbaugh’s show—where Dick Cheney frequently expatiates—has become the voice of the Republican establishment. The same could happen to the Democrats. The spitballs aimed at me don’t matter much. The spitballs aimed at Harman, Clinton and Obama are another story. Despite their votes, each of those politicians believes the war must be funded. (Obama even said so in his statement explaining his vote.) Each knows, as Senator Jim Webb has said repeatedly, that we must be more careful getting out of Iraq than we were getting in. But they allowed themselves to be bullied into a more simplistic, more extreme position. Why? Partly because they fear the power of the bloggers to set the debate and raise money against them. They may be right—in the short (primary election) term; Harman faced a challenge from the left in 2006. In the long term, however, kowtowing to extremists is exactly the opposite of what this country is looking for after the lethal radicalism of the Bush Administration.

Your fears are not unjustified, Mr. Klein. What I think you miss as a point is the anger of Blogtopia (© Skippy, the Bush Kangaroo, who’s hosting a “No Funds For Dems” rally at his place), and while that anger could, should and is being correctly directed at Clinton, Obama, and Harman, you have justified your own petar’ hoisting.

Let’s take your case, in particular, before we look at Obama et al. You write in your print column this week:

A strange thing happened to me the day the House of Representatives voted to pass the Iraq-war-funding bill. Congresswoman Jane Harman of California called as the debate was taking place. “Look, I would love to have cast a vote against Bush on this,” she told me. “We need a new strategy, and I hope we can force one in September. But I flew into Baghdad [with 150 young soldiers recently]. To vote against this bill was to vote against giving them the equipment… they need. I couldn’t do that.” I posted what Harman said on Swampland, the political blog at Time.com, along with my opinion that Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama had changed their positions and voted against the funding for the worst possible reason: presidential politics.

And then Harman changed her position. After we spoke, she voted against the funding. The next day, I was blasted by a number of left-wing bloggers: Klein screwed up! I had quoted Harman in the past tense—common usage for politicians who know their words will appear after a vote takes place. That was sloppy and… suspicious! Proof that you just can’t trust the mainstream media. On Eschaton, a blog that specializes in media bashing, I was given the coveted “Wanker of the Day” award. Eventually, Harman got wind of this and called, unbidden, to apologize for misleading me, saying I had quoted her correctly but she had changed her mind to reflect the sentiments of her constituents. I published her statement and still got hammered by bloggers and Swampland commenters for “stalking” Harman into an apology, for not checking her vote in the Congressional Record, for being a “water boy for the right wing” and many other riffs unfit to print.

(emphasis added) They is none so blind as he who will not see.

Let me describe this from where I, a moderate to liberal Democrat who often gets accused of the same things you do: apologizing for a dysfunctional system, see this. Let’s use Harman’s quote as the underpinning of this description, but you and I both know you’ve screwed up like this before, and I could substitute any number of topics here. You raised this one, however.

As a blogger, I understand the value of being “firstest” with a story. I haven’t broken any stories on my blog, but when I find a tidbit that I think may become a story shortly, I write about what I’ve found. This often means going back later and realizing I made a mistake when things didn’t turn out the way I predicted they might.

Which is, in effect, what you did with Harman’s statement: published it, but got the story wrong. Nothing wrong with that. Should you have waited to check her vote in the CR? I think so, but I’m not paid to be first (or right…I just prefer it that way).

But think about this for a second: your idea of a breaking story is to tell us what a politician told you.


True, you are not a beat reporter on the police desk, trying to dig up the facts around a murder, or an investigative journalist hellbent on uncovering the bribe that allowed a Hormel plant to package bad meat.

Neither, and this is the important bit, are you the mouthpiece for any politician whom you have access to, which is what annoys us most of all about you, as well as Tim Russert, or Chris Matthews, or anyone who appears on TV on a regular basis pontificating about “the news”.

We bloggers are asking the right questions, questions that demand answers. We don’t have the access or influence to truly press a politician about those questions.

You have the access, yet you don’t ask the right questions. Can you imagine how frustrating that is?

Admittedly, some of the questions can range from vitally important to pretty ridiculous. No one’s saying you should be our mouthpiece either. But when a Jane Harman talks about “supporting our troops,” the legitimate question of “why do we even have troops in the field any longer and isn’t voting for this bill an endorsement of that policy?” has to be asked. If you had, it sure wasn’t evident from the story you posted (I should note here that, while I do not know Marcy Winograd, Harman’s primary challenger in 2006, I do regularly correspond with a family member of hers).

Neither did you explore this issue in your print piece I’ve linked to, and I’d like you to do that: explain why, when you have this access, you aren’t asking tougher questions.

I can think of several reasons on my own: the Bush administration has been very tough on journalists who don’t tow the line, for one; for another, you won’t get invited to the cool parties in Georgetown if you’re viewed as an adversary.

These are rather weak excuses, if you ask me: my freedom depends on your reporting and the reporting of hundreds of others in Washington. In toto, you’re collectively failing to do your jobs. Joe, your small “gaffe” is a tiny piece of it, but as with global climate change, every atom of carbon adds up to the crisis.

With global climate change, if we can’t stand the heat, there’s nothing we can do about it, except look to our own lives and hope we can make a difference. With your reporting tho, we can. We can call attention to our dissatisfaction with your efforts, and hope you’ll do better next time. We can ask you to keep a more critical eye on the reporting of others, to stop sucking at the teat of the cocktail circuit and go back and start recalling the lessons you learned in Journalism 101.

As Izzy Stone put it, “Report the news so that no story is a surprise to anyone.” You don’t want us on your butt about getting the Harman story wrong? Then make sure it’s right.

Let me talk about the politicians here, as well. Part of the problem we on the left (even us moderate lefties) have with Obama, Clinton, and Harman, amongst nearly all the others (even Mike Gravel), is that they serve two houses: us and mammon. We, the people, feel we ought to come first, but let’s face facts. We, the people don’t any longer. When a politician is elected on November 3rd, let’s say, and by November 4th has sent out her or his first contribution solicitation (don’t laugh, I’ve gotten them), it’s annoying to me, but it also speaks volumes about who really has a Senator’s ear in DC.

And YOU, Joe, ought to be calling them on that! Instead of enabling them by transcribing what they say (and boy, does Stephen Colbert have the DC media by the balls when he talks about this!) you ought to be asking who benefits from their talking point, and looking into that. And this goes for Democrats as well as (and in particular with) Republicans.

We would cut Clinton and Obama slack if we thought you and your journalist buddies weren’t going to go roll over for the next flavor politician. We can’t trust you to do your jobs, so we have to do it for you.

Frankly, I’d be happy to hand this back over to you. I’d prefer that you wrote the stories, and me and Duncan and Kos and everyone over at My Left Wing could say “Gee, that Klein guy really got a story out of Hillary over her war vote!”

We do it for Olbermann. We do it for Stewart. We did it for Dobbs at CNN when he talked fact and not propaganda, and for Jack Cafferty. Hell, we did it for Imus when he asked the tough questions, and look where he ranks on our radar now!

Since it’s up to us to defend our right to know, I’m sure you can understand that some of us are justifiably panicked by this assault on our freedom, and we’ll overreact.

Really. People get scared when the impending image of our future is a world where corporations and government tag-team us, and the only referee is owned by AOL, or General Electric, or Disney, or Viacom. We might, just maybe, view the deck as stacked against us and get a bit pissed off.

Were the overall criticisms of you fair? Joe, I’ve read your column for years now, and I find you to be fairly even-handed, middle-of-the-road (sorry, you’re not that liberal), but willing to take an honest look at issues. But an honest look at issues means going out and testing the information you have, and if you don’t do it, that bothers me. A lot.

Quoting a general on the ground in Iraq is fine. But Knight Ridder made a lot of news by actually getting on the ground and seeing what the captains and colonels thought. We need you to do the equivalent of that when it comes to a self-serving statement by political phonies who deign to allow you to quote them because it might distort their record in a way that massages their chances for re-election.

In effect, using you as a tool.

I’d feel pretty ugly about that, if I was in your shoes.

Read Full Post »

A Very Milky Conundrum (Suzie-Q Edition)

by- Mentarch … 13:30 EDT

One of the main (non)arguments of religious fundamentalists against the process of evolution is that God created man in His image and that, subsequently, humans have ever remained unchanged since the creation of Adam and Eve some 6000-10000 years ago.

Each time I hear such reality-disconnected fallacies, what immediately springs to my mind is the proven existence of numerous mutations in our genome which have emerged over the last 150000 years or so since the evolutionary advent of homo sapiens sapiens (with many mutation events actually occuring well after the presumed “Godly Creation of Man”) – especially those mutations which cause genetically inherited diseases, such as muscular dystrophies, epidermolysis bullosa, et al..

However, considering the intellectual sloth-driven, ignorance-striken, fearful and parochial mind-think of religious fundamentalists, I doubt that they would be able (let alone be willing) to grasp the simple and obvious concept that the existence of such disease-causing mutations constitutes in itself proof of the basic genetic mechanisms which underlie the process of evolution.

Truth be told, I have this strong suspicion that they would simply reply that such horrible things were the Will of God following the Fall of Man.

Very well, then. Here’s one small evidence (among a legion of others) that not only negates such feeble arguments against the reality of evolution, but which also actually invalidates the so-called literal-interpretation of holy scriptures.

And this evidence has everything to do with milk. (more…)

Read Full Post »


by- Suzie-Q @ 4:47 PM MST

Happy Birthday to one of my best friends, GEF! 🙂

The Beatles- Birthday

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

%d bloggers like this: