By- Suzie-Q @ 7:00 PM MST
![]()
From the Justice Department to the Just Us Department
Carpetbagger Report
Posted June 24th, 2008 at 2:46 pm
I don’t want to alarm anyone, but it appears the Justice Department, throughout Bush’s two terms, flagrantly and repeatedly broke the law by politicizing the hiring process. Yes, I know we knew that before, but the DoJ’s Inspector General has made it official.
Justice Department officials over the last six years illegally used “political or ideological” factors to hire new lawyers into an elite recruitment program, tapping law school graduates with conservative credentials over those with liberal-sounding resumes, a new report found Tuesday.
The blistering report, prepared by the Justice Department’s inspector general, is the first in what will be a series of investigations growing out of last year’s scandal over the firings of nine United States attorneys. It appeared to confirm for the first time in an official examination many of the allegations from critics who charged that the Justice Department had become overly politicized during the Bush administration.
“Many qualified candidates” were rejected for the department’s honors program because of what was perceived as a liberal bias, the report found. Those practices, the report concluded, “constituted misconduct and also violated the department’s policies and civil service law that prohibit discrimination in hiring based on political or ideological affiliations.”
According to the investigation, the Justice Department began ignoring merit and making employment decisions based on politics in 2002, when then-Attorney General John Ashcroft restructured the honors program, taking decisions away from career officials in each section of the department, giving power to Bush appointees. When Alberto Gonzales took the reins, the illegalities expanded and were intensified.
If you were affiliated with the Federalist Society, you were practically a shoe-in. If Bush appointees saw certain buzz words in your c.v. — works like “environmental” and “social justice” — your application was rejected.
Leave it to Bush and his cohorts to transform the Justice Department into the Just Us Department.
Kevin highlighted this fascinating portion of the I.G.’s report, on the perspective of one DoJ employee who could barely believe what he saw.
Daniel Fridman began his career with the Department in December 2004….[In] September 2006 [Michael] Elston assigned him to work on the Screening Committee along with Elston and Esther Slater McDonald.
….Fridman learned that McDonald was obtaining additional information about candidates on the Internet when he saw notations by McDonald providing information that was not contained in the candidate’s application. When Fridman asked McDonald how she obtained the additional information, she told him she conducted searches on Google and MySpace.
….Fridman said McDonald also circled or otherwise identified items on candidates’ applications about which she apparently had concern, such as membership in certain organizations like the American Constitution Society, having a clerkship with a judge who was perceived as a liberal, having worked for a liberal Member of Congress, or having worked for a liberal law school professor.
….We asked Fridman to review a sample of approximately 50 applications of deselected candidates who had outstanding academic records. Fridman said that he would have voted yes on each of the candidates….At the end of the interview, Fridman stated: “I’m still kind of reeling from the resumes that you . . .showed me . . . people from Harvard, Yale, Stanford who were deselected. There were a lot of them. And I am shocked and very disappointed about that. . . . I didn’t know that this was going on. I thought that this was being conducted in good faith. I was conducting my reviews in good faith and making my recommendations based on merits and what I thought were the people [who] were going to be the most qualified candidates for the Department. And I’m sickened by this. And I’m not happy that I’m associated with this.”
I can’t say I blame him.
I do, however, have a question. What happens if Obama wins the presidency, and has to deal with a Justice Department staffed with a bunch of unqualified conservative activists who were rewarded in an illegal employment scheme?













I will say it again… our country has been hijacked by NeoCon criminals!
~~~~~
We are on Empty Wheel’s blog on this story too!
Thanks Empty Wheel!
http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/06/24/first-doj-ig-report-on-politicization/
She linked to us on this story in her article:
http://suzieqq.wordpress.com/2008/04/23/robert-coughlin-former-doj-official-pleads-guilty-in-abramoff-related-charge/
You are rockin’, Suzie Q!
Congress and the media (bloggers) need to look at former justice attorneys promoted for doing the right *wing thing along with all the ones fired for doing their jobs correctly.
Finally, it’s official. Not that I expect the Lamestream Media to take much notice. And the DOJ itself claims to have addressed the problem, but what does that mean? My guess is that new hires won’t be so blatantly partisan, only 60% Repuke/neocon/theocrats. The ones already hired aren’t going to get fired and replaced by no dang tree-hugging Pinkos, you can be assured – no more than Scalia, Thomas and Alito are about to quit the Supremes. (who anyway are not the same without Diana Ross.)
Two things come to my mind when I contemplate the prosecutors’ purge affair. The preference for fourth-tier Regent grads over the best and brightest from Harvard of course. But there was something Krugman said back in Mar. of ‘07. The bigger scandal wasn’t about the nine prosecutors who were fired because they refused to abuse their offices for partisan witch-hunts, but the eighty-some who weren’t fired because they were completely corruptible.
And they’re all still there.
Hi Sad But True,
Exactly and until that changes… our Justice system is not balanced!
The mainstream has to be held accountable at some point for their own inaction of not reporting the news and/or their own lies. You would think the newspapers and networks would take the hint with reader/viewership so down.