anthony @ 17:15 BST
Implicitly acknowledges controlled demolition only means by which towers could have fallen at free fall speed
Paul Joseph Watson | Prison Planet | Tuesday, October 16, 2007
The National Institute for Standards and Technology has been forced to admit that the total free-fall collapse of the twin towers cannot be explained after an exhaustive scientific study, implicitly acknowledging that controlled demolition is the only means by which the buildings could have come down.
In a recent letter (PDF link) to 9/11 victim’s family representatives Bill Doyle and Bob McIlvaine, NIST states, “We are unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse.”
A 10,000 page scientific study only offers theories as to how the “collapse initiation” proceeded and fails to address how it was possible for part of a WTC structure to fall through the path of most resistance at freefall speed, completely violating the accepted laws of physics.
[More]
9/11: A Refutation of the Official Collapse Theory…
…is an article by Dr Judy Wood in which she argues that gravity alone cannot account for the speed at which the Twin Towers collapsed.
For the Twin Towers to have collapsed at the speed at which they did and in the way that they did can only be explained by controlled demolition.
It is this article more than any other piece of evidence which convinced me that the “official” explanation for how the Twin Towers came down is false and that 9/11 was an “inside job”.
Read this article even if you read nothing else on the subject.
[More]
New Movie – Improbable Collapse – Scientific Evidence of a Controlled Demolition of the Twin Towers
Film showing scientific evidence of a controlled demolition of the World Trade Center Twin Towers on 9/11.
Improbable Collapse is the first film to thoroughly review the evidence for WTC demolitions from a scientific perspective.
Watch “Improbable Collapse” now for free on Google Video
The film includes an exclusive interview with Steven Jones, a professor of physics at Brigham Young University. Jones argues that the mechanism of the building collapses proposed by US government investigators is extremely unlikely, hence the title of the film. His influential research paper is entitled “Why Indeed did the WTC Towers Collapse?”
The original version of Improbable Collapse enjoyed a successful premiere on April 9th in New York City and follow-up showing at the Chicago conference in June. At both events, we acquired new images and interviews that we believe greatly enhance the film.
Most significantly, we took advantage of new opportunities to complete our work by adding interviews with Glenn Corbett, Kevin Ryan, and Steven E. Jones.
Kevin Ryan was dismissed from his executive position at Underwriters Laboratories in 2004, after the public release of a letter he wrote to Frank Gayle, a scientist in the World Trade Center fire investigation. Ryan asked Gayle to clarify the results of a UL fire test on behalf of the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST). In the test, steel structures similar to those used in the WTC were subjected to furnace fires for two hours at temperatures higher than those in the Twin Towers on September 11th. The steel withstood the test easily, and Ryan concluded this raised serious concerns about the NIST collapse hypothesis.
This is the first interview Kevin Ryan has granted on film.
Glenn Corbett, a professor of fire science at John Jay College in New York, serves as a lead adviser to the Skyscraper Safety Campaign. He has been outspoken in criticizing the rapid scrapping of steel recovered from the Ground Zero site, and the resulting handicap to all investigations of the collapse mechanism. However, Corbett provides a balancing perspective with his strong support of the widely accepted hypothesis that the Twin Towers came down as the result of plane hits and damage from fire, and that WTC 7 fell due to damage caused by the fall of the other buildings and subsequent fire.
Watch “Improbable Collapse” now for free on Google Video
anthony’s stache of articles and papers on 9/11.
- 9/11 and the British Broadcasting Conspiracy
- An explosion of disbelief – fresh doubts over 9/11
- Andreas von Bülow Interview: Former German Minister of Research and Technology
- Former Bush official says 9/11 an “inside job”!
- Former CIA official supports Professor’s claim that official 9/11 Islamist conspiracy theory are lies
- Gore Vidal: Reflections on 9/11
- Ground Zero Building Catches Fire, Doesn’t Collapse
- MIT’s Jeff King: 9/11WTC Collapse Was Controlled Demolition
- Senior French Govt. Official Questions 9/11
- Senior Military, Intelligence, and Government Officials Question 9/11 Commission Report
- THE GERMAN SECRET SERVICE SPEAKS OF 9/11
- U.S. Navy ‘Top Gun’ Pilot Questions 9/11
- 9/11 CONSPIRACY – NORMAN MINETTA TALKS ABOUT CHENEY ORDERS
- 9/11 Pentagon Attack: A Closer Look
- New study from Pilots for 9/11 Truth: No Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon
- Norman Mineta Confirms That Dick Cheney Ordered Stand Down on 9/11
- Pentagon 9/11 Eyewitnesses – The PentaCon Smoking Gun – Conspiracy Revealed
- The PentaCon Smoking Gun – Conspiracy Revealed
- 9/11: A Refutation of the Official Collapse Theory
- 9/11: Total Proof That Bombs Were Planted In The Buildings!
- 911 EXPLOSIVE REALITY
- Fetzer: How was the WTC demolished?
- FRAUD AND DECEPTION CITED AS REASONS FOR CORRECTION REQUEST
- Gordon Ross 9/11 Collapse Presentation
- Purdue Simulation Full of Hot Air
- Why Indeed did the WTC Buildings Disintegrate?
- WTC cancer cluster ‘like Hiroshima’
After doing all of this research Anthony, doesn’t it make you shake your head when people plug their ears and sing “lalalalalalala, I can’t hear you”?
Infuriating.
They hear me, and some dismiss me as a conspiracy theorist, and laugh at me, some say they agree, but what can we do about it, or, yes, anthony, but get a life… , “all it takes for evil to succeed is for good men to do bugger all”.
Anthony,
Right, but the way I heard it is…
“..all it takes for evil to succeed is for good men to do nothing!”
…and there’s still plenty of Americans around doing something good..
*Cheers*
I hear you.. How does one influence.